#VMWARE FUSION VS WORKSTATION WINDOWS#
The Windows client was always two or three releases ahead of the Linux client. Setting up a remote desktop only takes a minute or so, but the Workstation itself takes some time." "The big issue that we've always had with VMware, was the disparity between what was presented for a Windows-based client and a Linux-based client. I rate it four out of 10 for ease of installation.
#VMWARE FUSION VS WORKSTATION SOFTWARE#
Otherwise, I have to deploy ESXi Virtual Edition and emulate it, which is painful and clunky." "It would be better if software updates occur automatically." "Installing VMware Workstation isn't so easy. I would like to deploy virtual switches and play around with networking a bit more. "The price of VMware Workstation could improve." "It would be great if VMware Workstation had more networking options and compatibility, that would be great. It's easy to attack and compromise the host." "The solution should improve its native integration with other public cloud solutions." "Failure capabilities are insufficient for disaster recovery." "If you have a bigger implementation, you need more tools to coexist with many, many features that are not present in the base Hyper-V." Also, Hyper-V has security vulnerabilities. The same applies to performance." "The solution could improve by having virtual restore." "I have found it difficult to manage more than one virtual machine." "Hyper-V doesn't have a lot of features and is limited compared to other virtualization software." "The biggest problem with Hyper-V is that the virtual machines are mostly running on top of the Windows Server, so we often need to reboot the machine and virtual machines when updating the host level. Even as far as disk management tools are concerned, it would be better if that could be made simpler. Management could be more straightforward. "Hyper-V isn't a lightweight solution like VMware. However, VMware Workstation users are more satisfied with the technical support they receive than are Hyper-V users. ROI: Users of both solutions report a positive ROI.Ĭomparison Results: The two solutions are very comparable and receive similar ratings in most categories.
VMware Workstation users report being satisfied with the level of the support they receive. Service and Support: Hyper-V users share mixed reviews on the technical support.VMware Workstation users say that it is a low-cost solution. Pricing: Users of Hyper-V are satisfied with the solution’s pricing.VMware Workstation users report that it is reliable and high performing but its interface could be improved. Reviewers mention that its cloud integration could be improved, and they would like to see better disaster recovery capabilities. Users of Hyper-V like the solution’s ease of use, user friendliness, and the ability to do checkpoints and roll back to the checkpoint. Features: Users of both products are happy with their stability and scalability.Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions say deployment is straightforward.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
We performed a comparison between Hyper-V and VMware Workstation based on our users’ reviews in five categories.
0 kommentar(er)
